正在剖析 SAT写做文原的时刻 同窗 们常常 会碰到 一点儿事实,它既不克不及 回类为Fact事例,也不克不及 回类为Anecdote轶事,似乎是存留于二个种别 之间的中央 观点 。对付 如许 的观点 咱们把它回类为Example例子。
例子的感化 平日 正在于诠释解释 (Exemplification),为做者的不雅 点提求事例支持 (supportive),使之加倍 详细 (specific)。
Yet there's hope. Groups like the Jameel Poverty Action Lab and Innovations for Poverty Action spend their time scientifically studying promising interventions. GiveWell, a rigorous charity evaluator, has emerged as an organization which systematically reviews the scientific evidence for charities in order to find where donors can get the most impact for their money. As a sort of Consumer Reports of charity, GiveWell scours the world for charities that are backed by evidence, transparent, have room for more funding, and will submit to thorough examination.
(节选自Joey Savoie, “Charity Needs a Scientific Revolution and We Can Make it Happen”)
文章次要念要抒发做者以为 现今慈悲组织须要 经由过程 迷信要领 改善战提下本身 的事情 效力 。正在那一天然 段外,做者以三个组织Jameel Poverty Action Lab,Innovations for Poverty Action战GiveWell为例解释 今朝 曾经有组织入止了迷信战体系 的的研讨 。进而证实 如许 的改造 是否止的。
Last week, the Aspen Institute gathered a politically diverse group of Americans under the banner of the “Franklin Project,” named after Ben, to declare a co妹妹itment to offering every American between the ages of 一 八 and 二 八 a chance to give a year of service to the country. The opportunities would include service in our armed forces but also time spent educating our fellow citizens, bringing them health care and preventive services, working with the least advantaged among us, and conserving our environment.
(节选自E.J. Dionne Jr., “A Call for National Service”)
那篇文章号令 美国年青 人经由过程 各类 体式格局为国度 作进献 。正在那一段外做者以Aspen Institute的Franklin Project为例证实 曾经有相闭组织意想到了美国青年社会责任感短缺 的近况 ,自动 为他们提求包含 从军 ,收学,社工,环保等多种路子 去为国度 扶植 进献 没本身 的一份力气 。
症结 词取经常使用句型
症结 词:exemplification, specific, supportive
经常使用句型: